Wednesday, August 8, 2007

Luke Richardson to Ottawa - that's nice, I guess!

He's an Ottawa boy. That's good. He's going to be paid $500,000 - that's not bad. There's a minor league clause in the contract, if media reports are to be believed... that's OK.

The problem? He's 38, played only 27 games in Tampa last season and has scored but two goals since the end of the 2002-2003 season. Exactly how much can he be expected to contribute to the Sens' bottom line in 2007-2008?!

Sure, GM Murray and Coach Paddock are acknowledging that Luke Richardson will be the "seventh defenceman", but it's the minor league clause that gets me more where I live. Why? I believe that the AHL should be a training ground for young players who are just a little bit shy in the skill department. It's a place for guys to get that last bit of seasoning before making it to "The Show". It shouldn't be a place for someone whose star lacks the lustre it once had, a holding place for a guy to toil, waiting for an injury to happen.

If Richardson is going to be the seventh defenceman, what happens to Lawrence Nycholat? I thought he was going to be the seventh defenceman. Didn't he get re-signed to a two year deal only a few weeks ago?

The Senators don't have the depth on defence it once had - and based on what we saw last year, there are few NHL-ready defencemen down there in Binghamton.

I'm hoping that I'm wrong and that Richardson brings some of the grit and determination he once showed. He never was a point getter, so he won't turn into one here. Will he inspire some of the younger players like Grant Ledyard did while he was in town? Maybe... if he's not four hours south of Ottawa playing with the junior Sens.